Action/Adventure
Animation
Classic
Comedy
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Fantasy
Horror
Romance
Sci-fi
Short Films
Suspense
Television
Thriller
 
 
 
Not a Member Yet,
Click here to Register
 
 
Which of the following best describes your current relationship with the cinema?
Love/hate - I love the movies but hate cineplexes, overpriced lobby treats and seat-kicking mutants
[tally: 44%] 44%
Last film I saw in an actual theatre was Tootsie and I was so tramautized I haven\'t gone back since.
[tally: 14%] 14%
It\'s right up there with life\'s essentials: breathing, eating, sleeping, drinking and masturbation.
[tally: 16%] 16%
Cinema, schminema. My life revolves around reality tv. I\'m an intellectual.
[tally: 12%] 12%
If I can\'t watch it sprawled on my couch, surrounded by Cheetos bags and beer cans, fuggedaboudit.
[tally: 13%] 13%

votes: 1362
 
Movie Site : Movie Reviews : Drama : The Shape of Things Page 1 of 1
 
Title: The Shape of Things
Rating:
Full StarFull StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star
Genre: Drama
Release Date: , 2003
MPAA Rating: R
Runtime: 96 minutes
Director: Neil LaBute
Writer: Neil LaBute, based on his play
Distributor: Focus Features
 
Other Information:
 
 
Rogue's Review:

Close Encounters of the Vile Kind

When he was much younger, Woody Allen said that he would most likely have been a sniper on top of a building if he hadn't had his writing career. After seeing 3 of his self-penned movies now, I have come to the conclusion that the same fate might have awaited Neil LaBute if he hadn't gotten his writing 'thingie' off the ground.

"The Company of Men" was vile, "Your Friends and Neighbors" was more subversive about it but vile just the same (even though I actually really liked that one), and now we have "The Shape of Things", a 4-character indulgence which involves a personal betrayal of the vilest nature. Vile can be valid, don't get me wrong, but in LaBute's hands it seems to be more of a way for him to exorcise his own demons rather than attempt to consistently present us with believable situations and thoughtfully well-written characters. Of course he SHOULD exorcise those demons (the Woody Allen statement comes to mind again), but it would be much better if he could start doing it in a more constructive, less indulgent way.

This movie itself is very much like the character LaBute creates in the film (which was a play originally and feels like it, also not good) - the character played by Rachel Weitz, who portrays "EVElyn", a lovely little Gemini sociopath, to Paul Rudd's Adam: this is NOT a spoiler because it's mentioned in the film's synopsis. Weitz' character brutally exploits Rudd's character under the guise of an 'art' project for school, but in reality, her project would have been more appropriate for a psychology class experiment or even more appropriately, for a dissertation in Sadism 101.

The film does the same thing: from the title, it seems like it's some sort of commentary on our society but in reality it's just an excessively mean-spirited indulgence on LaBute's part. There is no truth here, not really, and because of this, the acting isn't very good either, especially in the scenes where Rudd is supposed to be devastated by Weitz' betrayal -- at no time do we actually feel anything resembling reality in his reaction to her cruelty. He doesn't transmit genuine hurt or anger or any combination of those two, and when he sort of acts like he's crying, it's even less believable. Sort of like the film itself.

 
User Reviews:
 
 
Average User Review:
Empty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty StarEmpty Star
 
Breakdown of User Reviews:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
 
Add rating and review for this movie:


Reviews and Related Content Copyright @ 2008, RoguesReviews.com - All Rights Reserved
Movie Titles and Poster Images are copyrighted by their respective owners and strictly used here for editorial purposes.

Powered by Built2Go PHP Movie Review v1.5.1 © Big Resources, Inc.